Does it impact my life if somebody else wants to thank a hypothetical supreme being for gifting them their cheerios? Not in the least. Does it mean I'm going to worship them and give thanks for my breakfast cereal? No, not really. Could some higher intelligence have set the machinations of the universe in motion? Sure why not, the universe exists after all - so there's some modicum of evidence. There are a whole lot of belief systems out there, and just about any of them can be interpreted in a way that doesn't conflict with our currently understood observable view of the universe. I'm forced to conclude that you wouldn't know a "statistical sample" if it bit you on the behind.Īctually, I think a fundamental tenet of agnosticism is not giving a fuck. The only way you could invalidate that would be if you assumed that somebody was outright lying: either the people running the study, or a LOT of the recipients. p.001 and a huge effect size on the delays that sort of thing is treated as more or less certainty in a lot of places, including biology and all of the social sciences. Medical studies wish they could hit that kind of significance on a regular basis. Do 10 percent of your packages get lost? Because I order a lot of stuff by mail, and I don't see lost packages enough to even notice it. 9 out of 89 packages "atheist" packages never arrived, versus 1 out of 89 "non-atheist" packages. The non-response rate was 4 out of the 89, which means that there really wasn't a chance of selective response removing the significance.Īnd all the packages WERE NOT delivered. It was a perfectly valid sample over delivery routes, it had a meaningful if not fabulous N, and it also had a control that most data can only dream of. What, exactly, do you mean by "it wasn't a statistical sample"? "Statistical sample" is not a statistical term.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |